Last weekend, my cousin's beautiful daughter, not long out of medical school, wed her sweetheart - a handsome young doctor from an Indian family.
kqed.org
The Hindu wedding event ceremony was incredible, colourful and substantial fun for everyone. Watching as young English and Indian people danced together, I reflected that the day was a best example of multicultural integration as all of us want it to be.
usa.gov
But it is precariously naive to take these advantages for approved and to anticipate that the conference of cultures will immediately lead to universal love.

The UK has probably the finest record of any country in the manner in which, for centuries, it has actually taken in immigrants and refugees from every corner of the planet, using a safe and civilised sanctuary.

From the Huguenot Protestants who got away massacres in France during the 16th century, to the Jews getting away Nazi genocide throughout the Second World War, right approximately the Ukrainian ladies and children offered shelter today, British tolerance and empathy have been a lifeline for millions.

Now that tolerance is being extended to its limitations. Mass immigration, intensified by people-smuggling on an industrial scale, is destabilising our country.

We should not fall into the trap of expecting that, because it has actually typically exercised fine in the past, Britain can absorb any quantity of demographic change.

We have actually never seen intensifying migration on anything like the scale of the previous twenty years, wites Prof Robert Tombs

History reveals that, even here, unexpected influxes of migration have triggered upheavals that last for centuries. And we have never seen escalating immigration on anything like the scale of the past 20 years.

Official figures from the Department for Education revealed on Thursday that white British kids are currently the minority in one in 4 schools in England.

This transformation has actually been especially marked in our big cities. At Rockwood Academy in Birmingham, for example, there was not a single white British student recorded among the 1,084 who attend the school.

Last week likewise saw the publication of a report from Professor Matt Goodwin at Buckingham University, forecasting that white Britons will be a minority of the population by 2063 - hardly more than a single generation.

By the end of the century, according to his figures, 60 percent of the country will have been born overseas or will have at least one moms and dad who is an immigrant. By then, more than 19 percent of Britons will be Muslim (compared with the existing 7 percent). Goodwin's forecasts are based upon census data and figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

I think these numbers terribly ignore the true rate of modification. They presume a consistent increase and steady geopolitical conditions, when we have every factor to anticipate both of those aspects will show unstable.

An anti-immigration protester holds up a placard during a demo in Dover in 2020

Climate modification could have a disastrous effect on migration, if even a couple of of the more alarmist theories are substantiated.

Tens of countless people in low-lying countries such as Bangladesh might be made homeless if sea levels increase. Millions more would flee their homes if glacial melt in the Himalayas triggered catastrophic flooding in India.

Civil wars in Sudan, Congo and Eritrea have actually currently driven massive varieties of people to cross the Mediterranean into Europe. African nations from Nigeria to South Africa are in danger of tearing themselves apart, and the outcome would be a massive rush of people seeking to escape the battling.

These upheavals would be small compared to the consequences of war between India and Pakistan, or in the Middle East. In those cases, Europe might see 100 million refugees or more.

Contribute to that the rise of organised crime and individuals trafficking. For all Sir Keir Starmer's bluster about 'smashing the gangs', he closes his eyes to the truth that this is a multi-billion-pound organization - one that will not cease simply since he makes speeches.

These are not minor bad guys. They are global cartels, who have discovered a revenue stream that rivals earnings from the drugs trade. The Government has no concepts at all about how to stop them.

The varieties of economic migrants making the dangerous crossing from France in overloaded rowboats are mounting, often topping more than 1,000 in a single day.

The cumulative result is mind-blowing. According to the House of Commons library, 44,000 individuals arrived unlawfully in the 12 months to March - which figure, obviously, represents just the individuals we understand about. Much more have likely slipped under the radar, landing unnoticed or concealed in lorries and containers.

But 44,000 equates to simply 5 percent of the migration total for the year. Legal arrivals surpass the ones by about 20-to-one.

Nothing in our long and remarkable island story has actually ever come close to this. Mass immigration, introduced by New Labour under Tony Blair, is a negligent experiment in demographic transformation that has actually never been tried in Britain before.

But it has occurred somewhere else. And for native populations, it has actually often been devastating.

When Europeans settled in the Americas, from the 16th century, they required their way on to the land. In Australia and New Zealand - nations that were much less densely populated - there was less large-scale violence however the impact on the aboriginal people was no less devastating.

Significantly, the British Empire never permitted migration to India, which had actually a big settled population. British topics were encouraged to settle only in sparsely peopled locations: for circumstances, Canada and wide-open parts of Africa such as Kenya.

But in every case, as soon as this procedure began, it was quickly unmanageable. More than 6 million Irish emigrants shown up in the US during the 19th century, a 3rd of them in the area of less than a years from 1845.

Almost as lots of Italians emigrated to America, the majority of them between 1880 and the early 1920s. In a country riven with racial divisions, the Italian and Irish neighborhoods battled to make it through, often of course by effort, but also by political corruption and organised criminal offense.

Starry-eyed Left-wingers like to claim that Britain too is a 'nation of immigrants'. That's utterly disingenuous.

William the Conqueror, who arrived across the Channel in 1066 with his own flotilla of boats, brought only about 7,000 guys. Yet that small army and the French-speaking Norman immigrants who followed destroyed the native Anglo-Saxon culture and subjugated an entire individuals.

Almost every large Saxon structure was demolished, the judgment elite was changed, their residential or commercial property seized and the language altered beyond recognition. For centuries, Saxons were forced to labour as serfs, despised as an inferior race by the colonising elite. Even Saxon saints were demoted.

It took a minimum of 400 years for the aftershocks of the Norman intrusion to diminish.

Resentments ran so deep they are still visible in our folk legends: Robin Hood was imagined as a Saxon knight combating Norman oppression. The concept of this 'Norman Yoke' inspired democrats well into the reign of Victoria.

Even today, almost a thousand years later, the Conquest might be embedded in our class system.

A 2011 study discovered that Britons with names indicating Norman descent - such as Mandeville, Lacy, Glanville or Percy - were on average ten percent much better off than those with Saxon artisan names such as Smith, Cooper, Baker or Shepherd, practically a millennium after the Battle of Hastings.

To comprehend completely how terribly damaged a country can be by unrestrained migration, we require only take a look at Northern Ireland. During the 17th century, 10s of countless Scottish protestants migrated to Ulster. Though separated by the Irish Sea, these 2 nations are so close that on a clear day they show up to each other.

This was a state project, started by the Scottish and English federal governments during James I's reign, and developed as a way of ending mass hardship in Scotland by encouraging people to live by farming in Ireland.

Well, we all know the outcome: it resulted in enmity and violence still widespread today that has actually seen thousands eliminated over the centuries.

Not all the social inequality in Britain is the outcome of the Norman intrusion, of course, any more than all Ireland's Troubles were the effect of a strategy to alleviate starvation in Scotland.

But when problems have complicated causes, people look for easy scapegoats - and migration will constantly provide one.

The UK population is now 69.5 million, according to the ONS. (Many think it to be

significantly higher). That's a boost of ten million this century. Yet the birth rate is falling: in 2023 it reached its most affordable rate on record in England and Wales, at 1.44 children per lady, compared to the 'replacement rate' of 2.1 - the variety of kids needed to keep numbers stable.

If our growing population is not due to giving birth, it should be driven by migration.

The falling birth rate is not a brand-new phenomenon. In 1938, it was forecasted that the UK population would peak within five years at 41 million, and that it would then fall progressively for the next 3 years, to 31 million by 1975.

In case, this ended up being nonsense, partly due to the fact that the main statistics did not prepare for the Second World War and the infant boom that followed.

But the forecasts likewise failed to appraise the beginnings of migration from former colonies, with numerous thousands getting here from the West Indies after 1948 - the 'Windrush generation' - and Pakistan and India following self-reliance and partition in 1947.

There were other surges, for example from East Africa after the increase of the despot Idi Amin who expelled 80,000 Ugandan Asians, amongst them the parents of former Home Secretary Priti Patel.

Crucially, the fantastic majority of these immigrants were determined to incorporate into British life. If not currently English-speaking, they learned the language. They tried to find work or began services. Many brought much required abilities and dynamism.

But that is not the case today. A high percentage of legal immigrants come to do low-paid work, for example in care homes and the hospitality sector. Those who qualify under the government visa scheme for proficient workers or health and care employees can anticipate to be paid 80 per cent of the standard income.

Those in the fishing market, for circumstances, get ₤ 12.82 an hour, rather than ₤ 15.88 for British employees. A comparable inconsistency uses in many trades from welding to dance and choreography.

When will white Brits end up being an ethnic minority? Map reveals areas where they already are

This has a threefold impact: earnings are depressed, new arrivals reside in relative poverty, and numerous British individuals have left of the labour market. Resentments grow on all sides and the cost is unsustainable.

Many other migrants, it needs to be said, maximize our generous asylum system - consisting of housing (in some cases in comfortable hotels), food, complimentary NHS healthcare and even investing money.

The best source of resentment, however, comes when immigrants decline to integrate. Incredibly, lots of on the Left motivate this by trashing our culture and libelling our history - raising every background other than the indigenous one. It spells disaster for our future when immigrants are motivated to remain locked within their own communities and taught that the British have constantly been their opponents.

How harmful this is, we can see by looking throughout the Channel, to France where 2nd and third generation immigrants from North Africa produce a consistent state of discontent. Riots are frequent, car-burning is a nationwide sport and extremist politicians talk of're-migration' - the expulsion of people who 'do not suit'.

This will be Britain's future if the Government does not take control of the circumstance right now. Immigration can benefit everybody, but only if it is strictly handled, democratically accepted and culturally integrated.

Allowed to run out of control, as the arc of history shows, it damages nations.

Professor Robert Tombs is the author of The English And Their History

FranceIndia